Filters:

Sort by year:

Network Hazard: Resilience and Moral Hazard in Network Formation

New Version, Submitted , 2024
More effective tools to mitigate contagion paradoxically increase contagion and volatility, and reduce welfare and resilience.

I develop a novel framework for studying network formation with continuum populations. I use the framework to examine contagion and resilience in endogenous networks, with applications to misinformation, supply chains, financial contagion, and epidemics. I examine the equilibrium effects of policies that mitigate contagion externalities and find that interconnectedness and concentration increase in response to interventions. This general equilibrium response negates the benefits of interventions and creates a “network hazard.” Despite interventions that mitigate contagion ex post, contagion and volatility are exacerbated and welfare and resilience are reduced ex ante.

Regulating Clearing in Networks

with Pablo D’Erasmo and Guillermo Ordoñez
New Version, Submitted , 2024
The Dodd-Frank reforms (i) reduce bilateral netting of derivatives instead of increasing multilateral netting and (ii) fail to address the origination of systemic risk in the core while potentially increasing the spread of contagion to the periphery.

Recent U.S. and European regulations promote centrally clearing derivatives to reduce complexity and systemic risk in the financial system. With a network model, we show that their effectiveness depends on clearing patterns. More clearing does not guarantee less systemic risk. Systemic risk can increase if multilateral netting increases at the expense of bilateral netting. We study confidential derivatives regulatory data and find evidence that contagion is less likely to start in the core but more likely to spread from the core. We introduce concepts of complexity and centrality within the financial network, exploring their implications for stability and regulatory oversight.

Financial System Architecture and Technological Vulnerabilities

with Michael Junho Lee
New, 2024
Cyber-risk of financial platforms create systemic risk due to (i) the network effects that create natural monopolies and concentration, and (ii) the strategic nature of cyber-attacks that target large platforms for maximum impact.

This paper presents a framework to study of technological resiliency of financial system architecture. Financial market infrastructures, or platforms, compete with services critical functions along various stages in the lifecycle of a trade, and make investments in technological resiliency to guard against attackers seeking to exploit system weaknesses. Platforms’ financial network effects attenuate competition between platforms on security. Exposure to vulnerabilities is magnified in the presence of strategic adversaries. Private provision of technological resiliency is generally sub-optimal, with over- and underinvestment in security depending on market structure. Vulnerabilities evolve over the maturity of a financial system, but there generically exists a tipping point at which technological resiliency diverges from optimal and creates technological drag on the financial system. We find supportive evidence in tri-party repo settlement: the exit of duopolist resulted in a significant drop in IT-related investment by the sole provider, even as peer firms ramp up investment.

Contagion in Graphons

with Francesca Parise, Alexander Teytelboym
Journal of Economic Theory , 211: 105673, 2023
The progression and the outcome of contagion in graphons closely approximate those in sample networks. In graphons, closed form solutions to a class of seeding problems can be obtained, which significantly outperform greedy or random seeding strategies.

The analysis of threshold contagion processes in large networks is challenging. While the lack of accurate network data is often a major obstacle, finding optimal interventions is computationally intractable even in well-measured large networks. To obviate these issues we consider threshold contagion over networks sampled from a graphon—a flexible stochastic network formation model—and show that in this case the contagion outcome can be predicted by only exploiting information about the graphon. To this end, we exploit a second interpretation of graphons as graph limits to formally define a threshold contagion process on a graphon for infinite populations. We then show that contagion in large but finite sampled networks is well approximated by graphon contagion. This convergence result suggests that one can design interventions for large sampled networks by first solving the equivalent problem for an infinite population interacting according to the limiting graphon. We show that, under suitable regularity assumptions, the latter is a tractable problem and we provide analytical characterizations for the extent of contagion and for optimal seeding policies in graphons with both finite and infinite agent types.

EC’20 Extended Abstract

Insider Networks

with Michael Junho Lee
2nd Revise and Resubmit, Journal of Economic Theory , 2023
Effective regulation of insider trading necessitates regulatory ambiguity, as insiders can outcompete regulators by exploiting economies of scale, and outsourcing obfuscation and “gaming” to a centralized group that acts as conduits between tippers and tippees.

How do insiders respond to regulatory oversight on the use of insider information? History suggests that they form more sophisticated networks to circumvent regulation. We develop a theory of the formation and regulation of insider information networks. We show that agents with sufficiently complex networks bypass any given regulatory environment. In response, regulators employ broad regulatory boundaries to combat gaming. Tighter regulation induces agents to migrate activity from existing social networks to a core-periphery insider network. A small group of agents endogenously arise as intermediaries for the bulk of transmissions.

Civil Liberties and Social Structure

with Camilo García-Jimeno
Revise and Resubmit, Journal of Economic Theory , 2023
Oppressive regimes that surveil societies to thwart potential threats while avoiding public backlash employ a “divide and conquer” strategy, discriminating against one (payoff-irrelevant) group and exploiting trust in another, even amidst evolving social structures.

Governments use coercion to aggregate distributed information relevant to governmental objectives –from the prosecution of regime-stability threats to terrorism or epidemics–. A cohesive social structure facilitates this task, as reliable information will often come from friends and acquaintances. A cohesive citizenry can more easily exercise collective action to resist such coercion, however. We present an equilibrium theory where this tension mediates the joint determination of social structure and civil liberties. We show that segregation and unequal treatment sustain each other as coordination failures: citizens choose to segregate along the lines of an arbitrary trait only when the government exercises unequal treatment as a function of the trait, and the government engages in unequal treatment only when citizens choose to segregate based on the trait. We characterize when unequal treatment against a minority or a majority can be sustained, and how equilibrium social cohesiveness and civil liberties respond to the arrival of widespread surveillance technologies, shocks to collective perceptions about the likelihood of threats or the importance of privacy, or to community norms such as codes of silence.

Network Hazard and Superspreaders

with Musa Eren Celdir
2023
More vaccinations led to more infections during the Covid-19 pandemic, mediated through increased foot traffic.

Higher availability and efficacy of protective measures against infectious diseases, such as vaccines, increases individuals’ propensity to socialize. Consequently, the number of visits to central points of interest (e.g., schools, gyms, grocery stores) and the rate of interactions with the agents employed therein (e.g., teachers, trainers, cashiers) increase. This opens more channels for the virus to transmit through the central agent or location. This leads to a manifestation of network hazard (Erol 2019). The infection rates can increase as protective measures become more effective and more available. Testable predictions of the theory are confirmed by the foot traffic data from 2019-2022 and historical COVID-19 vaccination and community transmission rates.

Social and Economic Distancing

with Guillermo Ordoñez
2020
The Covid-19 pandemic may have resolved a social coordination problem that previously hindered the adoption of more efficient remote work arrangements.

Dealing with pandemics, such as the recent COVID-19 virus, has highlighted the critical role of social distancing to avoid contagion and deaths. New technologies that allow replacing in-person for at-distance activities have blurred the mapping between social and economic distancing. In this paper we model how individuals react to social distancing guidelines by changing their network of economic relations, affecting total output, wealth inequality, and long-term growth.

Strong Stability and Contagion